"Since he released his marvelous 1967 essay on ekphrasis, or the literary depiction of visible paintings, Krieger has been wrestling with the bigger implications of the style for a conception of the way it manifests itself. during this considerate and thought-provoking publication, he forcefully grapples with the traditional paradox that phrases in time can appear to create photographs in space....This paintings of ample intelligence patiently unfolds the numerous puzzles and contradictions of ekphrasis, from the defend of Achilles to post-modernism."--Virginia Quarterly Review.
What, in it appears pictorial poetry, do words--can words--represent? Conversely, how can phrases in a poem be picturable? After many years of interpreting and brooding about the character and serve as of literary illustration, Murray Krieger the following develops his such a lot systematic theoretical assertion out of solutions to such questions. Ekphrasis is his account of the ongoing debates over which means in language from Plato to the current. Krieger sees the modernist place because the logical final result of those debates yet argues that newer theories considerably query the political and aesthetic assumptions of the modernists and the 2,000-year culture they declare to culminate.
Krieger makes a speciality of ekphrasis--the literary illustration of visible paintings, actual or imaginary--a shape not less than as previous as its most famed instance, the protect of Achilles verbally invented within the Iliad. Heargues that the "ekphrastic precept" has remained enduringly frustrating in that it displays the resistant paradoxes of illustration in phrases. As he examines the clash among spatial and temporal, among vision-centered and word-centered metaphors, Krieger finds how literary concept has been formed through the makes an attempt and the misleading disasters of language to do the activity of the "natural sign."